Banks Do Not Learn Lessons of History
By
Roberto Savio*
There is not one day going by now without
devastating news of the eternal tug-of-war
between finance and states. Now we are informed
that the Greek government, in order to continue
receiving useless subsidies (since it won’t
solve its problems) will lay off another 30,000
employees.
It
is difficult to understand how a country that is
suffering a critical contraction of its
consumption will be able to exit a cruel
downward spiral that will cause serious social
deficits, without solving its fiscal deficit.
However, the banks are not willing to eliminate
any of their bad practices that have caused the
current crisis.
The
US government has recently begun a gigantic
trial for fraud against a group of major banks.
The tendency of the US government is to accept a
huge compensation and close the legal
procedures. The Swiss parliament, after a
fraudulent maneuver of a trader that made the
Union des Banques Suisses loose 2.000 million
dollars, is studying how to increase the
capitalization of its banks in order to be more
solid. Everywhere, banks are fighting to stop
all the reforms of the finance system, since, in
the worst-case scenario, the US would intervene
to save them. According to official figures, US
lobbies spent 200 million dollars to prevent new
regulations.
Only in Great Britain have concrete propositions
been formulated. A special commission dictated
that in order to contain speculation, the
finance system must be separated into two
categories: one, banks that collect public
deposits, which cannot be used in speculative
activities; the other one, investment banks,
which are allowed to perform risk operations.
It’s important to remember that there wasn’t a
real major crisis until 1981 when Reagan started
to eliminate the banking controls and in 1999,
when Clinton ended up eliminating the Glass-Segall
law implemented in the Roosevelt era in order to
separately maintain deposit and investment
banks.
Obviously, in the face of these and other
reforming propositions, the banks have organized
an immense opposition campaign, declaring that
it would damage competitiveness, investors’
earnings, make loans more expensive and affect
the economy.
With a nerve that reveals the lack of ethical
constraints in the financing world, bankers
reply that the separation between deposit and
investment would increase the costs of
financing. Investors would feel less safe as a
result of reforms that would make it less
probable that governments rescue banks in the
case of a crisis. That is, they start from the
assumption that they own public money if they
risk bankruptcy incurred in irresponsible
speculations.
The
reaction of the North American banks was even
more extreme. The chief of JP Morgan Chase,
Jamie Dimon, declared that the reforms for the
control of the banks are “anti-American”, and
that the United States would have to denounce
the Basel agreement, which establishes global
rules on the banking system. This agreement
simply asks for the bank capitalization to
increase up to 10% in order to prevent the
banks’ continuation of compromising themselves
in operations that are many times higher than
their capital.
The
last Fitch Ratings informs that in June and
July, the 10 major US banks dropped 20,4% of
their investments in European banks, which
reached 97% in the case of Italy and Spain.
These banks had a total of 658.000 million in
investments of which 309.000 million were titles
issued by European banks, equivalent to 47% of
the total. This reveals that the North American
banks are strongly linked to the health of
European banks (and vice-versa). According to
analysts, banks are so worried that they are not
letting go of any money. This means that the
real economy–companies and families–are not
receiving credit, which was the original and
irreplaceable function of banks.
Meanwhile, the data of the social disaster that
we are living in is increasingly more shocking.
25% of European young people are unemployed. The
number of people on the poverty line is
increasing in many countries, first of all in
Italy, although, no country reaches the North
American extremes. The Institute of Statistics
recently released its yearly report which
registers an increase of 2,6 million new people
living below the poverty line, which now adds up
to 46,2 million: the highest number in 52 years
of statistics from the Institute. Of those, 20,5
million are in a condition of extreme poverty.
If the Republican Party wins the next elections,
social subsidies such as the food stamps will be
suppressed, which is some of the little help
that is left.
A
neutron bomb is falling over the rich countries.
It destroys the people while leaving the
infrastructures standing. Nowadays, the main
infrastructure of the North is not companies,
highways or agriculture: it’s finance. In the
US, it is already being said that this is the
lost decade. Hopefully it will only be a single
decade.
*Roberto Savio, founder and emeritus president
of the news agency
Inter Press Service (IPS) and publisher of
Other-News.info, which carried it on Oct 3,
2011.